Secure Talent - Seize Talent. Minimize Risk.
Avoid Worker Misclassification! Free 1099 compliance whitepaper.
Secure Talent Resources

WATCH OUT – California Targets Independent Contractor Misclassification with New Penalties

September 23rd, 2011

Summary: Last week, the California Legislature passed SB 459, known as the “Worker Misclassification” bill. This bill prohibits the willful misclassification of individuals as independent contractors and imposes penalties of between $5,000 and $25,000 per violation. In addition to these monetary penalties, violators are branded with a “scarlet letter” requiring them to prominently display a notice of the violation on their website, which must remain posted for one year.

Additional Details: What is a “willful” violation? The term “willful” is typically interpreted to require an intentional act or omission, and is defined in the bill as “avoiding employee status for an individual by voluntarily and knowingly misclassifying that individual as an independent contractor”. Additionally, the bill provides penalties for employers who make deductions from compensation to misclassified independent contractors that would not be allowed if the individual was an employee (for example, charging for materials, space rental, repairs, etc.).

The Legislature was likely motivated in part by the desire to recapture some of what is estimated to be billions of dollars in lost revenue from the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. Opponents of the bill (the California Chamber of Commerce and other employer-based organizations) call it a “job-killer” and argue that it creates an additional hazard for employers in attempting to navigate the murky waters of classification.

With this new bill, expected to be signed by the Governor in the next 30 days, the potential cost of misclassifying employees as independent contractors ratchets up another few notches — starting at $5,000 to $15,000 per violation and increasing to $10,000 to $25,000 per violation where the employer is found to have engaged in a “pattern or practice of violations”. Therefore, it is more important than ever to for employers to have a classification process in place that they can rely on to establish that they did not “willfully” violate the law.

Advice to employers: This new bill provides yet another indication of both the federal and state government’s intention to look to independent contractor misclassification as a source of revenue. Employers can provide an additional layer of protection from this liability by outsourcing the classification function to a reputable and knowledgeable third party, taking it out of the hands of hiring managers or others who may lack this specialized training and may be viewed as acting in their employer’s economic interests (and not considering the situation through an objective set of eyes).

Guess Who’s In The News Again?

October 22nd, 2010

More negative news  hit the perennial compliance whipping boy as FedEx agreed to pay $2.3 million to the state of Montana for the improper classification of their delivery drivers as independent contractors. As part of the agreement with the state, Fedex Ground also agreed to change their business model from independent contractors to independent service providers. Breakthrough, right? Well not exactly.

 FedEx’ Ground’s business model change  to independent service providers will require that providers register with FedEx as independent incorporated businesses. The providers will be responsible for the hiring, training and supervision all of their employees as well as providing unemployment and workers comp insurance.  The model that has been proposed is currently being used in Maryland, Tennessee, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, where it recently came into play after a settlement. Unfortunately something that was not promised, was whether FedEx will continue to control their provider’s uniform dress, schedules and their right to work for other companies.

Those that are less jaded than I have probably concluded that FedEx has finally seen the light and decided to change its ways. Don’t count on it. In all of our FedEx reportings throughout the years, FedEx has never accepted any wrongdoing and they sure didn’t bother to start now. Their new business model has been promised to be in place by June 2011 which gives them eight more months to find new loopholes. The state of Montana has also agreed to refrain from interfering in the first six months of FedEx’s migration to their new model.

The last time I checked, financial and behavioral control were still factors in determining whether a worker was an employee. So what if FedEx only deals with independent service providers going forward. Aren’t these providers performing a service that is integral to FedEx Ground’s core business? I get what they’re trying to do by turning it into a corp-to-corp business transaction. Just because the relationship of the parties appears to be legitimate, it doesn’t  mean that the other two forms of control are non-existent. Let’s hope that the state of Montana continues to monitor this closely.

FedEx Pays Up

July 21st, 2010

Lat Thursday, the Attorney General for Massachusetts announced that FedEx had agreed to pay $3 million dollars for misclassifying drivers as independent contractors. Worker misclassification has been problematic for the delivery company whose business model appears to classify a majority of their drivers, and what most people consider employees, independent contractors.

Fedex’s latest news maker is somewhat surprising since they’ve backed their business model all along. Now all of a sudden they decide to shell out $3 million! Who is this delivery company and what have you done to the old FedEx? Now, before we take notice of  FedEx’s “noble” actions, I can’t help but think  that maybe this was a ploy to soften up Massachusetts and the 13 drivers who have filed suit against them. If this was FedEx’s plan all along, they greatly undervalued their payout. The 13 drivers involved in the suit have indicated that they no intention of easing up but instead  will continue with their lawsuit.

Though have not heard the last of this Massachusetts – FedEx tangle. I can’t but help wonder if the $3million payment will hurt FedEx’s case as the lawsuit continues.  As usual, a FedEx spokesperson continued to deny the company’s liability and  stated that FedEx was merely trying to settle the dispute. Was it a guilty conscience? Hardly. The payout is a drop in the hat for a company that has a cost advantage of up to 30% on it’s  major competitor, UPS.  Whatever the reasoning for the payout, the bigger question is will this have any bearing on the class action suit taking place in Indiana. Stay tuned.


© 2009 Secure Talent, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy Home | Services | Resources | News & Events | About Us | Careers | Contact Us | Site Map